Understanding by Design<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Fink\u2019s 3-column table<\/a> and UbD Template are guides I have used to develop a unique innovation plan<\/a> for my organization. Both include the Big Hairy Audacious Goal (BHAG), activities, and assessments, which are essential for student growth and engagement. Both also include student learning lists for students to track their learning and see their growth. As there are many similarities in both tables, there are also differences that set them apart. Students need opportunities to collaborate and use technology in their learning, and both allow that to happen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The UbD template is more detailed and specific, like a Scope and Sequence issued by the district for teachers to follow. A list of essential questions guides teachers in creating their lesson plans. The UbD is a constructive component that educators benefit from to build their lessons. It is like a foundation or non-negotiables that the students will learn. On the other hand, Fink\u2019s 3-Column table is shorter and more student-centered, which benefits both the students and teachers because teachers can focus on activities that make it relatable to the real world. The table is directed to students\u2019 and teachers\u2019 needs because it considers their characteristics, like background knowledge. The backward design helps teachers structure an entire unit for planning. The UbD template<\/a> will guide my organization and Creating Significant Learning Environments<\/a> as I continue to work toward my innovation plan. With the UbD template, the end goal is kept in mind by keeping educators on task.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

UbD template and Fink\u2019s 3-Column table will support teachers to CSLE for students. Teachers will design lessons that engage students in their learning, resulting in student growth\u2014allowing students to learn effectively and purposely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n